What criteria affect program selection?
Proposals for programs must be based on a clear statement of the scientific problem, as well as a clear statement of why a program should run at a given time in the near future—i.e., launch of a new telescope requiring theoretical advances for the instrument’s best utilization or response of the theoretical community to an experimental discovery or a breakthrough in string theory needing further elaboration.
Selection of programming proposals depends on whether the science they entail is not only timely, but also exciting. In addition, program organizers must be recognized leaders in their fields. Good organizers attract good participants.
Organizers are asked to provide data describing the potential universe of program users. That task entails organizers contacting up to 100 possible participants to determine whether sufficient interest exists to guarantee good participation throughout the proposed program duration.
One important aspect of the KITP modus operandi is the extensive preparation made by program organizers to ensure sustained quality among participants. Programs are then announced one year to two years before they are to occur. Would-be participants make application. The usual selection rate is between 50 and 70 percent of applicants, with the more selective programs admitting one in three applicants.

